|2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)|
|Paper No. 66-11|
|Presentation Time: 11:15 AM-11:30 AM|
DILATANCY, PORE-PRESSURE FEEDBACK, AND REGULATION OF LANDSLIDE (AND THRUST FAULT) MOTION
IVERSON, Richard M., U.S. Geol Survey, 1300 SE Cardinal Ct. # 100, Vancouver, WA 98683, email@example.com.|
Diverse styles and rates of landslide motion may result from subtle differences in dilatancy and attendant pore-pressure responses in basal shear zones. At one extreme, landslides exhibit prolonged, stable, creeping motion regulated by dilation and negative pore-pressure feedback, and at the other extreme, they exhibit runaway acceleration enhanced by contraction and positive pore-pressure feedback. Intermediate landslide behavior can involve repeated stick-slip episodes that ultimately culminate in either runaway acceleration or long-term stabilization. A simple mechanical model generates all three types of landslide behavior as a consequence of modest differences in dilatancy, hydraulic diffusivity, and assumptions about the possible rate-dependence of basal friction. No assumptions are necessary regarding “state” dependence of friction (commonly invoked in fault-slip models to account for time-dependent healing that affects friction), because transient pore-pressure responses provide an intrinsic time scale that governs evolution of the frictional “state.” Another key difference between this landslide model and most fault-slip models involves the driving force, which is specified in terms of gravitationally imposed stress rather than tectonically imposed strain. In the landslide model, gravity-driven inertial motion of a poroelastic block is coupled to pore-pressure change in a thin basal shear zone that deforms inelastically. This pore-pressure change is described by a boundary condition that assumes Darcian flow of fluid and conservation of solid and fluid mass within the deforming shear zone. With addition of a tectonic driving force, the same model may provide a suitable framework for analyzing the dynamics of low-angle thrust faults, such as those analyzed statically by Hubbert and Rubey in their landmark paper of 1959 (Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., v. 70, p. 115-166).
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
|Session No. 66|
M. King Hubbert at 100: The Enduring Contributions of Twentieth-Century Geology’s Renaissance Man
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 602/603/604
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 196
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.