2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 25, 2003)
Paper No. 103-5
Presentation Time: 2:35 PM-2:50 PM


HUNT, Andrew G., United States Geol Survey, Denver Federal Center, Bld 21, MS 963, Denver, CO 80225, AHUNT@usgs.gov, LAMBERT, Rebecca B., USGS, 5563 DeZavala Road, San Antonio, TX 78249, WAUGH, John R., San Antonio Water System, 1101 E. Market St, San Antonio, TX 78298-2449, and LANDIS, Gary P., US Geol Survey, P.O. Box 25046, MS 963, Denver, CO 80225

To fully understand the interaction between the freshwater zone (FWZ) and the saline-water zone (SWZ) of the Edwards Aquifer, discrete samples were taken from monitor wells with screened intervals (open bore hole) >150m. Sample depths were selected based on vertical profiles of temperature and specific conductance obtained from fluid logging. Discrete intervals then were sampled using a 6-liter Kemmerer sample flask. Samples were analyzed for major ions, trace metals, stable isotopes (dD, d18O, d13C), dissolved gases (noble and major), and tritium. Total dissolved solids (TDS) ranged from 360 mg/L to 19,000 mg/L with Cl- concentrations ranging from 10 mg/L to 9,000 mg/L. The FWZ water is dominated by HCO3-, whereas the SWZ water is dominated by Cl-. 4He values (ranging from 62 to 357556 mcc/kg) strongly correlate with Cl- concentrations and have a distinctive R/RA of 0.22 +/- 0.007. Occasionally, noble gas abundances are fractionated with respect to air saturated water because of hydrocarbons trapped in the SWZ. Stable isotopes (dD and d18O) indicate that the sampled waters are meteorically derived and deviate slightly from the meteoric water line with increasing TDS. Relative age constraints suggest that the FWZ waters are dominantly modern (post 1950), whereas the saline waters are considerably older. Standard mixing relations indicate that the SWZ is simply a zone of mixing between fresh water and brine, however the gradational change observed in the SWZ indicates that the mixing process is complex. Logging and sampling results suggest that waters in the FWZ move rapidly through high conductivity strata (fractured/conduit flow), while waters in the SWZ migrate more slowly either because of lower hydraulic conductivity or lower recharge rates. Within the SWZ, trapped connate water has mixed with fresh, meteoric water over time to produce the saline water. In the FWZ, connate water has been removed over time because large volumes of fresh water have flushed the aquifer system.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 25, 2003)
Session No. 103
Karst Hydrology and Geomorphology in North America Over the Past Half Century II: In Honor of Derek Ford and William White
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 607
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 280

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.