|2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)|
|Paper No. 236-1|
|Presentation Time: 1:45 PM-2:00 PM|
COMPARATIVE GEOCHEMISTRY SUGGESTS PROTOTAXITES WAS A GIGANTIC FUNGUS
BOYCE, Charles Kevin1, HOTTON, Carol2, FOGEL, Marilyn L.3, CODY, George D.3, HAZEN, Robert M.3, and KNOLL, Andrew H.4, (1) Department of the Geophysical Sciences, Univ of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (3) Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Rd, NW, Washington, DC 20015, (4) Botanical Museum, Harvard Univ, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138|
The enigmatic Devonian fossil Prototaxites produced large, tree-like trunks up to six meters tall that were composed exclusively of three distinct types of interwoven tubes 5 to 50 microns in diameter. Since its original description as a conifer, Prototaxites has been interpreted as an alga, a lichen, and as an extinct lineage not closely related to any extant group. Most recently it has been interpreted as a fungal fruiting body due to its hyphae-like tissue composition -- despite the absence of spores or unambiguous anatomical details that would ally it to any specific fungal group. Carbon isotopic ratios have been measured for Prototaxites and co-occurring fossils from one Upper Devonian and four Lower Devonian localities. Unlike contemporaneous vascular plants, Prototaxites samples have an isotopic range, within and between localities, of up to 13 per mil. If original, such a large range would be difficult to reconcile with autotrophy and would seem to require heterotrophic metabolism on isotopically distinct substrates, consistent with a fungal interpretation. The observed isotopic range comprises discrete light and heavy populations. The light values are close to those of vascular plants from the same localities, while the heavy values may be attributable to algal source carbon, potentially an important part of early terrestrial ecosystems despite poor representation in the macrofossil record. Ongoing organic analyses should provide additional information concerning diagenesis, as well as independent tests of biological interpretations.
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
|Session No. 236|
Paleontology/Paleobotany VI: Paleobotany: Systematics, Ecophysiology, and Paleoclimate
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 4C-3
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, November 5, 2003
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 587
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.