PROFESSIONALS AS PCVS: CAN PCVS OR THE PEACE CORPS OPTIMIZE BENEFITS VS. OBSTACLES?
I founded a geophysics program at a Ghanaian university. This led to post-PC work for the Ghana Geological Survey, academia, the Federal Government, and the United Nations. Flexibility of in-country PC and Ghanaian managers helped me try unusual tasks. Resourcefulness learned in a developing country taught me to build coalitions to pursue tasks otherwise unachievable in undercapitalized programs in public service. However, rapid advancement and high expectations from my time in Ghana was an obstacle with later stints in less dynamic working environments elsewhere.
The Peace Corps was a creative employment agency (finding an excellent position in a surprise location), and gave invaluable training on the host country, plus a support system of medical and other services. Less positively, the staffs job description underrated the local situation, stating that a lack of books and equipment would hamper my work. I arrived to find more than adequate books and equipment, and a more stimulating geological community than the job description implied. Such descriptions might unnecessarily discourage applicants. Communications gaps between PC Washington and PC Uganda resulted in confusion over a possible post in Uganda. A psychological experiment performed on me during my training could have irritated local sensitivities and damaged the PCs local reputation. These and other glitches that I have heard about might be reduced by refining the PCs 5-year rule to foster some increased internal corporate memory, and/or institution of limited peer review by former PCVs/staff of PC vision/plans/operations.
Thoughts for prospective PCVs: (1) Dont take the glitches to heart; the staff isnt much more experienced in the system than you are! (2) Read the State Department Country Study for your host country. I wish that one had been provided to me immediately after my selection to serve in my particular host country.