ASSESSING ECOLOGICAL DOMINANCE FROM THE FOSSIL RECORD
A literature review of 21 groups reveals several methods, largely controlled by the availability and variety of data sources, that can be used to assess their dominance history. A taxic approach can be employed when the studied clade is the most diverse group within a community. For example, rugose corals were both ecologically dominant and most diverse in the Devonian. Dominance in reef facies is recognized through the ecological role of each taxon. As the main framework builder, calcareous sponges were the most important, and thus ecologically dominant, component of reef communities in the Late Paleozoic and Late Triassic. Shells beds, easily identified in the rock record, are another approach used to assess dominance. For example, bivalve shell beds are extensive in the Early Triassic, a time when bivalves were one of the most abundant and dominant groups. Rock types named after a particular clade are another indication of ecological dominance, as illustrated by graptolite facies. Counts of abundance are also used to estimate dominance. For instance, brachiopods can be considered dominant in the Middle Triassic because they represent 90% of some marine communities. Any one or a combination of these methods can be applied to other taxa in an effort to define ecological dominance. Ultimately, production of a temporal history of dominance for marine invertebrates will allow for a better understanding of how ecological dominance has shaped evolutionary trends.