KARST SCIENCE IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA : DIFFERENT CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES FROM DIFFERENT STUDY SITES
Moreover, according to the considered study sites, the proposed concepts and approaches may be quite different. Some examples taken from Europe and North America karsts will help in pointing out these differences. The most illustrating example is certainly the role of joints and bedding planes in the development of caves and karst drainage network. North American scientists insist on the importance of bedding planes, mainly because most of karstified carbonate formations develop in relatively simple structural conditions. At the opposite, French karst hydrogeologists abundantly work on the role of rock fracturing and ignore bedding planes in karst development and functioning.
It must be said to William White's and Derek Ford's merit that they strongly contributed to the progressive emergence of common concepts and approaches in karst science. First of all, they made common all over the World the most famous fields and works concerning karst in North America. Afterwards they both turn their multiple experience to account, at the same time both being cavers, chemists and earth scientists. At last, as specially done by Derek Ford and his karst partner Paul Williams, they integrate to their experience that from Europe research teams, particularly from France. In that way, they are the real pioneers of an integrating cave and karst science, which should be based on general and unique concepts and approaches.