Start |Author Index | View Uploaded Presentations | Meeting Information

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)

Paper No. 10
Presentation Time: 10:30 AM

A STRATIGRAPHIC AND MULTI-GEOPHYSICAL APPROACH TO LANDSLIDE INVESTIGATION: THE QUESNEL FORKS LANDSLIDE


BICHLER, Ahren J.1, BOBROWSKY, Peter T.2, BEST, Mel E.3, DOUMA, Marten4, HUNTER, Jim4, CALVERT, Tom5 and BURNS, Rob4, (1)School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Univ of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada, (2)Canada Landslide Program, Geol Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada, (3)Bemex Consulting International Ltd, 5288 Cordova Bay Road, Victoria, BC V8Y 2L4, Canada, (4)Geol Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada, (5)Energy Research Branch, 580 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, ahrenb@uvic.ca

A site investigation was conducted at a landslide located on the Quesnel River, British Columbia, Canada. The landslide and consequent damming of the river occurred on April 28th, 1996. Subsequently, the diverted river course resulted in bank-side erosion and is now impacting an important historical site. Stratigraphic and geophysical studies were conducted on the terrace and landslide to gain a better understanding of the triggering mechanisms and failure process and to better prepare for future failures in the area. This study represents the first successful integration of several multi-parameter geophysical techniques complementing sub-surface field observations at such a landslide.

The stratigraphy of the terrace primarily consists of advance-phase glacial sediment deposited during the last glaciation. The units include: interbedded silty sand and clay, pebble gravel, laminated sand and a thick (~20 m) massive clay. The surface of the terrace is composed of coarse recessional glaciofluvial gravel. The landslide is about 340 m wide and 400 m long and consists of two blocks representing approximately 1.7 x 106 m3 of displaced sediment.

Ground penetrating radar (GPR), direct current (DC) resistivity and seismic refraction and reflection surveys were conducted. Rupture surfaces and separation planes were identified in addition to the geometry of stratigraphic units. The rupture surfaces dip 40ºN and 65ºN for the upper and lower blocks, respectively. Both ruptures cut through all stratigraphic units except the lowest most unit. The toe of the surface of separation was 10 m deep and shallows away from the landslide.

The presence of a clay unit high in the stratigraphic succession creates the potential for failure. A combination of the removal of lateral support by toe erosion and loading of terrace sediment by a perched water table are thought to be the triggering mechanisms. As long as the landslide toe remains stable, further terrace failure is unlikely to occur.

Session No. 128

Engineering Geology
Tuesday, 4 November 2003: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p.311
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.
Back to: Engineering Geology
<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract