|2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)|
|Paper No. 82-5|
|Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-9:20 AM|
SUPERCONTINENTS DURING THE PROTEROZOIC - A PALEOMAGNETIC SURVEY
PESONEN, Lauri J. and ELBRA, Tiiu, Division of Geophysics, Univ of Helsinki, PO Box 64, Helsinki, 00014, firstname.lastname@example.org|
Palaeomagnetic data are used to construct the positions of continents during Proterozoic. The data have been compiled from literature, from Global Paleomagnetic Data Base and from theses. Applying stringent reliability criteria, the assemblies of cratons at twelve slots in the 2.45-1.00 Ga period have been constructed. The continents lie predominantly in low to intermediate latitudes. The sedimentological indicators of palaeoclimate are consistent with magnetic latitudes, with the exception of the Early Proterozoic, when low latitude glaciations took place. The continental configurations are generally in agreement with geological models of their evolution. The data suggest that three landmasses existed during Proterozoic. The oldest Kenorland broak up during 2.45-2.10 Ga as manifested by dykes and sedimentary basins on many continents. The global 13C-excursion occurred during this break up, although the exact cause for the 13C-anomaly is unknown. The second landmass is Hudsonland which existed from 1.83 to ca. 1.50-1.25 Ga. The configuration of the continents forming Hudsonland is different than the previously proposed supercontinent Columbia. The Neoproterozoic supercontinent Rodinia was formed by continent-continent collisions during ~ 1.10-1.00 Ga and involved most continents. A new model for its assembly is presented, which suggest that multiple Grenvillian collisions took place during 1.10-1.00 Ga. The position of Kalahari is problematic since its Grenvillian belts are oceanwards. The position of Siberia is also problematic since geological data indicate that it is circumferenced by oceanic rocks. It is not known with which continent Baltica collided during its amalgamation with Rodinia. We have proposed that the counter continent was Congo/São Fransisco but there is no geological support for this. Another possibility is Amazonia. The configurations of Kenorland, Hudsonland and Rodinia are different pointing to variable tectonic styles in their formation, reflecting perhaps changes in sizes and thicknesses of the cratons as well as changes in thermal conditions of the mantle through time. References: L.J., Pesonen, S.-Å ., Elming, S. Mertanen, S. Pisarevsky, M.S. D´Agrella-Filho, J. Meert, P. Schmidt, N. Abrahamsen, G. Bylund, 2003. Tectonophysics, v. 375, 289-324.
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 82|
1500 to 2500 Ma: A Period of Changing Mantle Regimes in Earth History?
Colorado Convention Center: 708/710/712
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 8 November 2004
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 206
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.