|2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)|
|Paper No. 181-4|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM|
REAPPRAISAL OF SEISMOSAURUS, A LATE JURASSIC SAUROPOD DINOSAUR FROM NEW MEXICO
LUCAS, Spencer G.1, HERNE, Matthew C.2, HECKERT, Andrew B.3, HUNT, Adrian P.1, and SULLIVAN, Robert M.4, (1) New Mexico Museum of Nat History & Sci, 1801 Mountain Road NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, (2) 12 Wareana St, Menora, Perth, 6050, Australia, firstname.lastname@example.org, (3) New Mexico Museum of Nat History, 1801 Mountain Rd NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104, (4) Section of Paleontology and Geology, The State Museum of Pennsylvania, 300 North Street, Harrisburg, PA 17120-0024|
The holotype and only known specimen (NMMNH P-3690) of Seismosaurus hallorum Gillette is from the Upper Jurassic Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation near San Ysidro, New Mexico. It consists of several dorsal vertebrae, several cervical and dorsal ribs, an incomplete pelvis, a sacrum, and ~ 20 caudal vertebrae including two chevrons. Axial length estimates of Seismosaurus of as much as 52 m have been used to identify it as the longest dinosaur. However, they are largely based on mistaken placement of the middle caudal vertebrae and do not stand up to close critical scrutiny. Instead, an axial length estimate of 33 m is well supported. A single (right) femur (NMMNH P-25079) found as float at the type locality was excluded from the type series but appears to belong to the same individual as the holotype. As preserved, this femur is ~1680 mm long, and compares well with a reconstructed skeleton based on the axial length estimate used here. The supposed 240 gastroliths of Seismosaurus have been revealed to be highly polished quartzite pebbles that lack an unambiguous skeletal association; they are stream-deposited cobbles of a channel-lag deposit. The taxonomic validity of Seismosaurus also is questionable. Many of the supposedly diagnostic features of the genus are those of the caudal vertebrae that are spurious artifacts of misplacing the middle caudals as vertebrae 20-27 although, in fact, they are vertebrae 12-19. This correct placement reveals a caudal morphology strikingly similar to that of Diplodocus. Other supposedly diagnostic characters of Seismosaurus can be summarized as a relatively robust pelvis that has an unusual distal expansion of the ischium. This expansion, however, appears to be pathologic and is not mirrored in the second ischium (prepared subsequently), and the differences in proportions between the pelves of Seismosaurus and Diplodocus are minor---most metric ratios differ by less than 10%. Therefore, we consider Seismosaurus to be a junior subjective synonym of Diplodocus, though a case can be made for recognizing the New Mexican fossil as a valid species of Diplodocus, D. hallorum.
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 181--Booth# 4|
Paleontology (Posters) IV: Phylogeny/Morphology
Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, 9 November 2004
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 422
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.