|2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)|
|Paper No. 118-20|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM|
GEOMORPHIC HISTORY OF LAKE MICHIGAN COASTAL DUNES AT P.J. HOFFMASTER STATE PARK, MICHIGAN
DERBY, Sean1, TIMMONS, Emily1, ZIETLOW, Ryan1, KNAPMAN, Michelle1, MILLER, Daniel1, HANSEN, Edward, and BATEMAN, Mark D.2, (1) Geological and Environmental Sciences, Hope College, Holland, MI 49423, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) Sheffield Centre for International Drylands Research Department of Geography, Univ of Sheffield, Winter St, Sheffield, UK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom|
The geometry of coastal dunes at Hoffmaster State Park (11 km south of Muskegon) is among the most complicated along southeastern Lake Michigan. Young (<5 yrs) foredunes (relief <5 m) occur along the beach in front of a linear coastal dune ridge (up to 12 m high) with many blowouts. Three sets of large (up to 60 m high and 450 m long) parabolic dunes occur further inland. The set closest to the coast (Parabolic Set 3) partially overrides Parabolic Set 2, which partially overrides the set furthest inland (Parabolic Set 1). At their trailing edges Sets 2 and 3 are connected to fragments of linear dune ridges inland of the contemporary continuous ridge. At its leading edge Parabolic Set 1 partially buries a group of lower (relief of 10 -15 m) interconnected backdunes (Backdune Set 2) that overrides the still lower (relief <10m) Backdune Set 1. Samples were collected from approximately 1.3 m below the surface at 7 sites with a view to dating the sand deposited just prior to dune stabilization. Samples were sent to the Sheffield Centre for International Drylands Research for optical luminescence dating. Quartz was extracted from these samples and their palaeodose estimated using a single aliquot regeneration protocol. Despite a weak naturally acquired luminescence signal and replicates probably indicating some incomplete bleaching or post-depositional mixing of sediment, absolute ages were obtained for all 7 samples which are consistent with the overall site stratigraphy. Backdune Set 1 gives an age of 7.17 +/- 0.48 (1σ) Ka corresponding to the Nipissing I transgression. Backdune Set 2 gives an age of 4.32 +/- 0.28 Ka in the north and 2.25 +/- 0.25 Ka in the south. Parabolic Set 1 gives ages of 2.83 +/- 0.19 Ka (south) and 2.20 +/- 0.16 Ka (north) while Parabolic Set 2 gives ages of 2.79 +/- 0.26 Ka (south) and 1.9 +/1 0.13 Ka (north). These ages suggest that parabolic dunes may have stabilized in the south a few hundred years earlier than in the north. Parabolic Set 3 is currently active but a paleo-Inceptisol exposed in their interiors indicates an earlier period of stability. The large parabolic dunes appear to have developed from blowouts in coastal dune ridges. The presence of fragments of older dune ridges inland of the contemporary ridge suggests that there may have been a net progradation of the coast in this area since the Nipissing transgression.
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 118--Booth# 24|
Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, 8 November 2004
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 284
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.