|2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)|
|Paper No. 105-3|
|Presentation Time: 2:10 PM-2:30 PM|
TIMING AND PROVENANCE OF NEOARCHEAN-PALEOPROTEROZOIC UNCONFORMITY BOUNDED SEQUENCES ON THE KAAPVAAL CRATON
BEUKES, Nicolas J.1, DORLAND, Herman C.1, GUTZMER, Jens2, EVANS, David A.D.3, and ARMSTRONG, Richard A.4, (1) Department of Geology, Rand Afrikaans Univ, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, firstname.lastname@example.org, (2) Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa, (3) Geology & Geophysics, Yale Univ, PO Box 208109, 210 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, (4) Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National Univ, Canberra|
In this contribution we report on SHRIMP detrital zircon age populations from selected Neoarchean to late Paleoproterozoic successions on the Kaapvaal Craton. The following stratigraphic trends are displayed:
a)Systematic younging of the youngest detrital zircons from one unconformity bounded sequence to the next, providing a framework for depositional ages.
b)Abrupt variations in detrital zircon populations across major sequence boundaries, allowing more robust lateral correlation of sequences, especially in the late Paleoproterozoic red bed successions on the craton.
c)Distinct gaps in detrital zircon age populations. Most interesting is the scarcity of middle to late Archean detrital zircons suggesting that the Kaapvaal Craton itself was not a major source for the Paleoproterozoic sedimentary successions preserved on it.
The results imply that most of the detrital zircons were sourced from areas outside the present limits of the Kaapvaal Craton. It is also apparent that formation of prominent unconformity bounded sequences was related to major plate tectonic and crust forming events, each providing new detrital zircon populations. There is also no indication that any of the Neoarchean to early Paleoproterozoic successions on the craton were sourced from the 2650-2700 Ma orogenic event preserved in the Limpopo Metamorphic Complex. However, younger late Paleoproterozoic red bed successions contain abundant zircons of this time interval as well as a dominant population of ~2000 Ma detrital zircons. This may imply that the Limpopo Complex together with the Zimbabwe craton only became attached to the Kaapvaal craton at ~2.0 Ga during formation of the Magondi Mobile Belt which in turn sourced the voluminous late Paleoproterozoic red beds of southern Africa.
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 105|
Early Paleoproterozoic (2.5–2.0 Ga) Events and Rates: Bridging Field Studies and Models
Colorado Convention Center: Ballroom 2&3
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, 8 November 2004
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 255
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.