|2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)|
|Paper No. 145-9|
|Presentation Time: 10:30 AM-10:45 AM|
THE CASE FOR TEACHING EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
LEWIS, Jonathan C., Geoscience Department, Indiana Univ of Pennsylvania, 113 Walsh Hall, Indiana, PA 15705, email@example.com and CRONIN, Vincent S., Department of Geology, Baylor Univ, P.O. Box 97354, Waco, TX 76798|
The canon of topics typically covered in an introductory structural geology course can be enhanced by the inclusion of earthquake focal mechanism solutions (FMS) in the course content. FMS are useful to structural geologists because they provide information about non-recoverable strain, the geometry of active fault patches, and the orientation of net slip for a given earthquake. A primer for geologists on FMS has been developed and is available online at no cost through serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/structure04/resources.html. This site also contains a growing number of related complete exercises that are available to the community for use in teaching structural geology.
Several benefits are associated with inclusion of FMS in structural geology courses, including (1) improved motivation, (2) reinforced fundamental concepts and (3) broadened scope. FMS are essential to the study of active tectonics. Related issues of hazard recognition and risk assessment tend to endow structural geology with a sense of urgency and importance for students – a significant positive motivator. FMS integrate and reinforce key concepts related to the mechanics of crustal materials. The elastic component of crustal rheology is well illustrated with reference to earthquake data. The cycle of elastic loading, frictional failure, radiation of seismic energy, detection by seismograph stations, and analysis of first-motion records in an inverse process to determine the characteristics of the seismic moment tensor is an excellent example of an important 4D structural/geophysical problem. Resulting FMS provide constraints on present-day crustal kinematics. Use of FMS by structural geologists broadens the scope of our potential influence as scientists working in the public interest, as we seek an improved understanding of hazardous active structures.
FMS are routinely and rapidly computed for earthquakes of magnitude greater than 5.5 worldwide, and are easily obtained at no cost from online databases (e.g., neic.usgs.gov/neis/sopar and www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html). Hence, students can easily acquire FMS for use with corresponding geologic maps and literature to investigate the active tectonics of a given area.
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 145|
Teaching Structural Geology in the 21st Century
Colorado Convention Center: 703
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 9 November 2004
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 348
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.