INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGICAL FEATURES ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURE PROPAGATION
First, we present a review of the various hydraulic fracture diagnostic methods available depending on the information sought. Indirect hydraulic fracture diagnostic technologies are very well established and provide an overall idea of the stimulation results. Nevertheless, they are limited because the solutions are nonunique and require calibrations. Direct near-wellbore diagnostic techniques are commonly used because they are easy and relatively inexpensive to implement. However, their radius of investigation is limited to a few feet around the wellbore. Direct far-field diagnostic methods (e.g., microseismic mapping, tiltmeter mapping) provide accurate information on fracture development and geometry. The distance between observation well and observed fracture system should remain within 2000 ft.
Second, we present results of hydraulic fracture stimulations in various geological environments that have been monitored using microseismic data combined with both indirect and direct near-wellbore fracture diagnostic methods. We illustrate with these case studies that, in some instances, basic radial and planar fracture systems are generated as predicted by simple modeling techniques. However, in most cases, the final fracture system geometry is asymmetric and largely governed by geologic discontinuities such as joints, faults, and bedding planes. These geologic discontinuities significantly affect the overall geometry of the hydraulic fracture system. This can limit the fracture systems development, increase fluid leakoff, hinder proppant transport, or even create a complex fracture network. Ultimately, such factors will affect well productivity.