2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)

Paper No. 9
Presentation Time: 4:45 PM

VALLEY FILL FACIES AND CHARACTERISTIC GAMMA-RAY LOG RESPONSE PATTERNS, LATE PLEISTOCENE TO HOLOCENE TRANSGRESSION, OUTER BANKS, NORTH CAROLINA, USA


FARRELL, Kathleen M.1, CULVER, Stephen J.2, RIGGS, Stanley R.3, MALLINSON, David3, THIELER, E. Robert4, WEHMILLER, John F.5, HOFFMAN, Charles W.1 and HORTON, Benjamin P.6, (1)North Carolina Geol Survey, 1620 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1620, (2)Geology, East Carolina Univ, Graham Building, Greenville, NC 27858, (3)Geology Dept, East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC 27858, (4)U.S. Geol Survey, Woods Hole, MA 02543, (5)Department of Geology, Univ of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, (6)Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Univ of Pennsylvania, 240 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, Kathleen.Farrell@ncmail.net

A suite of nine rotasonic drill cores from the North Carolina Outer Banks records the Late Pleistocene (<14 cal. ka) to Holocene facies succession that infilled the paleo-Roanoke River valley, and its transition into the overlying modern barrier island complex. These data were collected as part of a cooperative research program including NCGS, USGS, ECU, University of Delaware and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Facies divisions and stratigraphic interpretations are based on integrated litho- and bio- stratigraphic analyses (foraminifera, diatoms), gamma logs, 14C and amino acid racemization (AAR) ages, and nearby seismic reflection profiles from Albemarle Sound and the adjacent inner continental shelf.

The paleo-Roanoke valley trends east-west and is up to 12 km wide and 36 m deep. Its cross section is asymmetrical, with the steeper side to the north. The base of the valley unconformably overlies a muddy open shelf deposit with an AAR age of 900-1200 ky. Above this, the valley fill includes a succession of four distinct facies (Units 1-4).

Unit 1 (0-6 m thick) is a basal gravelly sand that is barren of microfossils and fluvial in origin. Its gamma response is blocky and 5-20 cps. Unit 2, a complexly interstratified mud, sand, and intraclast gravel (<8 m thick), is problematic, with marine, marginal marine and fluvial-lacustrine indicators. Six 14C ages (10-14 cal. ka) indicate that Unit 2 includes the Younger Dryas chronozone. Foraminifera assemblages are inconclusive, but diatom data suggest that salinity increases upsection. The lower and upper boundaries of Unit 2 are flooding surfaces that are marked by abrupt shifts in lithology and gamma response. It has a sawtooth to spiky pattern (20–60 cps).

Units 3 and 4 contain open shelf foraminifera assemblages and are Holocene in age. Unit 3 (as thick as 12 m) is a gradational, shoaling (coarsening) upward sequence of burrowed mud and sand that infilled the paleo-Roanoke embayment. As grain size increases upsection, mud content and gamma response (i.e., cps) decrease (funnel-shaped log response). Unit 4, the Colington Shoals complex, is a 13 m thick interval of graded gravelly sands with a blocky gamma response (3-15 cps).

The valley fill and adjacent interfluves are overlain by Unit 5, a complex of barrier island sands as thick as 10 m, with a gamma response of 5-20 cps.