METAL ACCUMULATIONS IN CARBONACEOUS ROCKS—DO CONVENTIONAL MODELS EXPLAIN OBSERVED ENRICHMENTS?
Units considered in the modeling exercise include the Cretaceous Toolebuc Formation , Australia; the Mississippian Heath Formation, Montana; and units within the Paradox Formation, Colorado and Utah. Results of the modeling highlight a general inconsistency of published geologic and paleooceanographic conditions and the large mass of trace metals deposited. Typically, increased water depth, slower sedimentation, open circulation, or additional metal from other sources are necessary. An additional metal source seems likely for large metal accumulations such as the Toolebuc Formation which contains the equivalent of 400,000 times the annual recharge of dissolved vanadium to the ocean. Riverine input with elevated contents of vanadium has been proposed to supplement seawater but this source seems unlikely to account for the observed enrichments of Au. Redistribution of metals among ocean basins, and metals supplied by discharge of subsurface fluids were tested as alternatives.