COMPARISON OF ENZYMATIC BIOASSAYS TO CONVENTIONAL AQUATIC TOXICITY TESTING IN A MINING INFLUENCED STREAM
This study evaluated three commercially-available enzymatic toxicity assays: MetPLATETM, Toxichromotest®, and Super IQ® test kits (Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government). The MetPLATETM and Toxichromotest® assays use a modified strain of the Escherichia coli bacteria as the test organism. When the E. coli bacteria are not stressed, they produce the enzyme β-galactosidase, which cleaves a chromogenic substrate. Conversely, when the E. coli bacteria are stressed, they cleave lesser amounts of substrate or no substrate at all. The inhibition of the enzyme can be measured colorometrically with a 96-well spectrophotometer. The Super IQ® test kit also determines the inhibition of the β-galactosidase enzyme, but uses D. magna and is measured fluorometrically. The various methods were performed on water samples collected in August, 2003; March, 2004; and May, 2004. The results were compared for cost, ease of use, time efficiency, reproducibility, and comparability to traditional metal aquatic toxicity testing. Of the three tests in this study, the MetPLATETM assay provided the best reproducibility, comparability to traditional testing, and showed the greatest sensitivity to copper and zinc.