South-Central - 38th Annual Meeting (March 15–16, 2004)

Paper No. 5
Presentation Time: 3:00 PM

WHAT'S THE BIG PROBLEM WITH THE WICHITAS??


GILBERT, M. Charles, School of Geology & Geophysics, Univ of Oklahoma, 810 Sarkeys Energy Center, 100 East Boyd Street, Norman, OK 73019-1009, mcgilbert@ou.edu

Anyone who has read the Rudnick and Fountain (1995) review of continental crustal structure, and has studied paleo-rifts, will be entranced with their Figure 2. Why? Because it shows clearly the problem of comparing neo-rifts with at least some paleo-rifts, especially the Cambrian Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA). That problem lies in the following: the M-discontinuity (crustal thickness)of neo-rifts, on average, is around 28 km, distinctly different from that of shield/platforms at 43 km---a difference of 15 km. The SOA M-discontinuity is now about 45 km (see Brewer, 1982; Suleiman, 1993), essentially the same as that of the surrounding shield/platform 1.4 Ga Laurentian crust. Our problem is how to change what should have been the crustal thickness in the Cambrian, if the SOA behaved as modern rifts seem to do, to that of its present status, that of a part of the North American platform.

Assuming that the SOA had a rift-type crust in the Cambrian, there are basically three different scenarios to "add" the required 15 km or so: basaltic underplating, transformation of eclogitic mantle to gabbroic crust, or deformation (squeezing) by some large factor. There are no significant heating events, later than Cambrian, in the geologic record of the upper crust in the southern Midcontinent. Thus, both underplating and transformation of eclogite to gabbro seem to be out. That leaves deformaion. For this we can appeal to the Pennsylvanian Ouachita collision which will require massive compression in a very specific part of the lower, ductile crust.

Ultimately we are left with 2 broad questions: did older rifts originate as present rifts do (as assumed above), and how to change rift crust into platform crust. These have to be questions of general significance since the geologic record clearly shows that bigger plates (e.g., Rodinia, Pangea, Gondwana, etc.) get broken up into smaller, or different plates, with time---and this happens by rifting. The consequences of adopting a compression scenario should be applicable to a wide variety of geologic settings both in time and space.