|2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)|
|Paper No. 8-2|
|Presentation Time: 8:20 AM-8:40 AM|
ELECTRICAL GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS OF OIL FIELD SALINE WATER CONTAMINATION, OSAGE SKIATOOK PETROLEUM ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH SITE, NORTHEASTERN, OKLAHOMA
SMITH, Bruce D., U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, MS964, Lakewood, CO 80225, firstname.lastname@example.org, HAUNG, Haoping, Geophex Ltd, 605 Mercury Street, Raleigh, NC 27603, OTTON, James K., U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939 Box 25046, Lakewood, CO 80225, ZIELINSKI, Robert, U.S. Geol Survey, Box 25046 Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, KHARAKA, Yousif K., U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025-3561, and ABBOTT, Marvin M., United States Geol Survey, 202 NW 66th St. Bldg.7, Oklahoma City, OK 73116|
The first extensive field studies at the Osage Skiatook Petroleum Environmental Research Site (OSPERS), carried out in the fall of 2001, consisted of dc resistivity depth soundings and single frequency electromagnetic (EM) conductivity profiling. The dc resistivity surveys showed that subsurface plumes of contaminated water have resistivities lower than 5 ohm meters (electrical conductivity of 200 millisiemens per meter, ms/m). In contrast, background resistivities were found to be on the order of 50 ohm meters (20 ms/m). Resistivity soundings near the Skiatook Lake shoreline show there is a high conductivity layer overlain by a resistive layer. The high conductivity is likely due to the high TDS ground water in the region whereas the resistive layer is due to fresher waters of the lake and dryer sediments. The ground profiling EM measurements defined a geometrically complex, near surface (within 5m) conductivity anomaly produced by highly-soluble salts that do not always correspond to surface salt scars. Both resistivity soundings and EM measurements suggest that salts contamination has penetrated shale units normally considered aquitards. Drilling was carried out in 2002, based in part on these geophysical results and confirms the basic subsurface electrical interpretation. In August of 2003, depth imaging (multi-frequency) EM profiling and borehole logging was done. The subsurface interpretation of shallow high conductivity correlates well with geophysical induction conductivity logs and mapped the lateral extent of the shallow plumes. By chance repeat EM profiling measurements were made of part of the site before and after a rainstorm when runoff salinity was being monitored. At this time a marked increase in conductivity occurred within a narrow delta at the shore of Skiatook Lake. During May of 2005, EM profiles were completed on land and in the lake along shallows near the shore. Areas of high subsurface conductivity were mapped beneath the lake where an old, submerged, brine disposal pit is located and where previously noted high conductivities from runoff occur.
2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 8|
Environmental Issues Related to Oil and Gas Exploration and Production I
Salt Palace Convention Center: 250 DE
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, 16 October 2005
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 24
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.