|2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)|
|Paper No. 111-13|
|Presentation Time: 4:50 PM-5:05 PM|
PHYSICAL COMPACTION AS A CAUSE OF REDUCED CROSS-BED DIP ANGLE IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE
COREY, Meredith A., Oberlin College, 52 West Lorain St, Oberlin, OH 44074, email@example.com, SIMONSON, Bruce M., Geology Department, Oberlin College, 52 West Lorain St, Oberlin, OH 44074-1052, and LOOPE, David B., Department of Geosciences, Univ Nebraska - Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0340|
The Jurassic Navajo Sandstone is world-famous for its stunning large-scale cross-beds. Hunter (1977) and others delineated cross-beds formed by avalanching down dune slipfaces from those produced by related eolian processes. The current dip of the avalanche or sandflow cross-strata is about 24°, significantly lower than the angle of repose on comparable modern dunes. This discrepancy has been attributed to post-depositional modification by compaction, but few attempts have been made to test this interpretation quantitatively. As a pilot study, we made thin sections in 3 mutually perpendicular planes (horizontal, vertical parallel to strike, and vertical perpendicular to strike) from an oriented sample collected from sandflow layers in cross-bedded sandstone just outside Zion National Park (Utah). We then quantified the minus-cement porosity in each direction via point-counting and determined it was 28.5% in the horizontal direction vs. 31.3% in the vertical direction. Assuming a depositional porosity of 43%, this discrepancy corresponds to a differential shortening of about 29% in the vertical direction. With this amount of compaction, the current angle of 24° would correspond to a pre-compaction dip of about 32°, in reasonable agreement with measurements from modern dunes. Dissolution is evident on the edges of some detrital quartz grains, but this could not have been significant in lowering the dip angle because our data indicate well under 1% of grain volume was lost to chemical compaction. In summary, our data indicate the low dip angle of the Navajo cross-beds at our study site can be confidently attributed to physical compaction. They also suggest significant compaction (and therefore burial) took place prior to cementation (largely by sparry carbonate). A better understanding of porosity occlusion in eolian sandstones has a number of potential uses, e.g., interpreting the migration of petroleum and other fluids through the Navajo (Chan et al. 2000) and reflectors observed in Navajo sandstone with GPR (Jol et al. 2003).
REFERENCES CITED: Chan M.A. et al. (2000) AAPG Bulletin, 84(9): 1281-1309. Hunter R.E. (1977) Sedimentology, 24: 361-387. Jol H.M. et al. (2003) The Leading Edge, 22(9): 882-887.
2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 111--Booth# 0|
Petrographic Methods Applied to Sedimentary Rocks: To Celebrate the 80th Birthday of Bob Folk
Salt Palace Convention Center: 151 DEF
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, 17 October 2005
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 254
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.