|2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)|
|Paper No. 3-13|
|Presentation Time: 11:15 AM-11:30 AM|
HOLOCENE AMINOCHRONOLOGY AND TIME-AVERAGING FOR CHESAPEAKE BAY MULINIA
EDWARDS, A. L.1, WEHMILLER, J.1, LOCKWOOD, R.2, KAUFMAN, D.3, BRIGHT, J.3, CRONIN, T.4, and WILLARD, D.4, (1) Department of Geology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, email@example.com, (2) College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, (3) Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, (4) U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192|
The geochrononology of Holocene sediment cores is essential for determining the timing of both natural and anthropogenic environmental changes. The aminochronology for 81 Mulinia lateralis shells has been generated for a long sediment core from central Chesapeake Bay, MD03-2661. Our core preserves a 24.5 meter, nearly complete Holocene sequence that permits a reliable calibration curve of 14C dated shells with amino acid racemization (AAR). This 14C-AAR calibration can then be used to assess the extent of sediment reworking and time-averaging in this core, and allow the application of this method to other Chesapeake Bay sediment cores with old carbon complications. Aspartic acid (Asp), the most rapid racemizer on this time scale, is the principal amino acid of interest. Similar applications of 14C-calibrated AAR kinetics have also been used to assess taphonomic bias and time-averaging (e.g. Goodfriend & Stanley, 1996; Kowalewski et al., 1998).
Two approaches to calibrating 14C and AAR are used. Interval calibration involves multiple AAR analyses (>10) of Mulinia from previously 14C dated core intervals. Both linear and non-linear regressions of D/L Asp against 14C age yield comparable R-squared values (0.91), but the intercept value has not yet been determined by analysis of modern samples. Direct calibration, currently in progress for 8 samples, involves both AAR and 14C analysis of separate valves from articulated Mulinia individuals. Because direct calibration results are not influenced by time-averaging, they should provide insights into the reliability of the interval calibration.
Use of AAR data to assess time-averaging not only requires a calibration curve but also an understanding of all factors that cause a spread in D/L values for a given core interval. For intervals with >10 analyses, the coefficient of variation (CV) for D/L Asp is between 3 and 10%, with only two intervals having CV's >7%. These ranges may be interpreted as "normal scatter" around an analytical mid-point, with all samples being essentially the same age, however, time-averaging (as represented by larger CV's) seems most pronounced within a region of slow or interrupted deposition at ~1150 cm core depth , between 2800 and 5600 cal yrs BP.
2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 3|
Paleontology I: Paleoecology—Energetics, Environment, and Evolution
Salt Palace Convention Center: 151 ABC
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, 16 October 2005
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 15
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.