2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
Paper No. 32-3
Presentation Time: 4:10 PM-4:30 PM


GREB, Stephen F.1, SLUCHER, Ernie R.2, VENTERIS, Erik R.2, BREZINSKI, David K.3, MARKOWSKI, Toni4, BLAKE, Bascombe M. Jr5, and FEDORKO, Nick III6, (1) Kentucky Geological Survey, Univ of Kentucky, 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building, Lexington, KY 40506-0107, greb@uky.edu, (2) Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2045 Morse Rd, Bldg. C-1, Columbus, OH 43229-6693, (3) Maryland Geol Survey, 2300 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, (4) Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 3240 Schoolhouse Road, Middletown, PA 17057–3534, (5) West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, 1 Mont Chateau Road, Morgantown, WV 26507-0879, (6) Coal Program, West Virginia Geol and Economic Survey, Mont Chateau Research Center, P.O. Box 879, Morgantown, WV 26507-0879

There are increasing global initiatives to limit anthropogenic atmospheric carbon. In order to address the potential need for limiting carbon emissions, the U.S. Department of Energy has initiated a network of federal, state, and private sector partnerships to determine suitable technologies, regulations, and infrastructure for future carbon capture, storage, and sequestration in different parts of the country. Unmineable coal beds are one potential type of geologic sequestration reservoir. Coal beds are attractive sequestration reservoirs because they adsorb CO2 and because the sequestered CO2 will displace in-place methane, which can be recovered as a fuel. For sequestration purposes, coal beds need to be below drainage and below the level of surface fractures. Deep coal exploration tests and density logs from oil and gas wells that do not case off coal-bearing strata can be used to estimate cumulative thickness and depth of coals more than 1 foot thick and more than 500 feet below drainage. However, defining “umineable” coals from this cumulative deep resource is problematic. In concept, the idea of using unmineable coals offers a vast reservoir area for sequestration because the Appalachian Basin (and other basins) has significantly more deep, thin, unmined coals than shallow, thick, mineable coals. Also, many coal beds have broad spatial distribution in the basin, so may be near carbon dioxide point sources. The criteria for unmineable resources, however, varies because of geologic, economic, environmental, and political considerations. Some of the criteria addressed in a recent assessment of carbon sequestration potential in the northern and central Appalachian Basin by the Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership include thickness and depth restrictions based on current mining practices, stratigraphic limits based on coal beds that are not currently mined, and area restrictions that exclude regions of current mining. These criteria are not universal across the coal fields of the basin, thus different procedures are required in different areas of the basin for accurate CO2 sequestration assessments.

2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 32
Coal Geology
Salt Palace Convention Center: 254 B
3:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 16 October 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 83

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.