PRESERVATION OF CORES AND SAMPLES
As a test, a survey was made of the utilization of these data in the AAPG Bulletin over a three-year period (1979-1981). Two hundred twenty five articles were included in this review (including longer Notes). It was determined that 38% of the articles relied on core and/or sample data. When utilized, the data were the primary resource for 62% of the research and 38% as a secondary resource. The profile of authors was; company 24%, independent 2%, government 34%, and academic 40%. Material was both newly collected and accessed from an available facility. Only rarely was the final deposition of the samples given. Similar results were obtained in a survey of the Bulletin for the period 1996-1998. It is obvious these data are needed and utilized.
The natural resource system of an area can only be properly understood and utilized to the extent that its geologic history has been interpreted in four dimensions. This is true whether the issue is economic resources, environmental concerns, or the natural hazards. The information collected from wells drilled for a variety of purposes forms a permanent library that will be accessed and re-accessed as new resources and new research techniques are developed. Industry, societies, and agencies must participate in preserving these data.