FARMERSVILLE LANDFILL SAGA: GEOSCIENCE AND THE LAW
It can come as quite a surprise to an academic scientist the first time they are asked participate in the legal process as an expert witness. Obtaining unbiased background information can prove difficult. Facts that are of the most scientific concern may not be of legal relevance. As the process advances, questions arise that move further and further from your knowledge base, and clarifying the difference between your area of expertise and other related areas can prove difficult. Legal definitions of scientific concepts are sometimes counterintuitive or even bizarre. Random, tight deadlines combined with massive, jargon-laden legal records, impede careful consideration of issues. Scientists mostly work in impersonal terms, while legal cases can be a form of high drama, turning the usually equitable process of scientific discovery adversarial. It is this last aspect that can be the most disturbing, especially if one's integrity comes under assault, or one's words get twisted.
Sadly, this means that even the most ardent proponents of scientific public service can come away from the process jaded and unwilling to participate again. More effort should go into preparing future geoscientists for potential roles in public service, including public speaking or expert witnessing. Scientists who have familiarity with such roles should have more venues to share their experience. It is through such public service that our scientific disciplines gain public understanding and support.