GEOCHEMICAL AND SEDIMENTOLOGICAL RECORDS OF LACUSTRINE-SPRING INTERACTIONS: A LARGE SPRING MOUND OF THE EOCENE GREEN RIVER FORMATION
Spring and lake deposit δ18O values fall within the same range of each other (-10 to -5 per mil); however, differing trends occur within the spring deposits. δ18O values within the Wilkins Peak spring mound sequence are more positive (-6 to -5 per mil) coinciding with dolomicrite precipitation. More negative δ18O values from calcimicrite occur in Tipton spring deposits (-10 to -6 per mil). δ18O values of Wilkins Peak spring deposits reflect the onset of evaporation and closed-basin conditions in the lake, indicating that lake hydrology had a significant impact on spring deposition. δ13C values in adjacent Tipton lake deposits range from -1.5 to -0.5 per mil. However, δ13C values in contemporary spring deposits are higher, ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 per mil. Higher δ13C values from dolomicrite in the spring deposits may have resulted from the influence of highly evolved lake water during closed-basin Wilkins Peak time. In addition, scattered dolomitization in Tipton sequences of the spring deposit suggests that hypersaline-alkaline lake water may have infiltrated and remineralized parts of the Tipton spring strata. XRD and Stable Isotopic Analysis indicate that mineralogic changes in spring deposits mirror basin-wide geochemical trends. This suggests that spring discharge had little regional effect on the chemistry of the lake.