|2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)|
|Paper No. 143-6|
|Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM|
COMPARATIVE GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS OF THREE SUB-WATERSHEDS OF BEAVER RESERVOIR, NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
KURZ, Marie J., Dept. of Geology, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, firstname.lastname@example.org, PATTON, Jason A., Environmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, and BOSS, Stephen K., Dept. of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, 113 Ozark Hall, Fayetteville, AR 72701|
Understanding and deriving the geomorphometry of watersheds is an important task in understanding and modeling various watershed processes and also allows for a more valid comparison between watersheds. Increasingly, Geographic Information System software is utilized to derive and analyze watershed morphometrics. To evaluate the sensitivity and robustness of morphometric parameters derived from data of differing resolution, three sub-watersheds of Beaver Reservoir, northwest Arkansas were analyzed and compared. The study is part of a larger EPA study relating lake sedimentation to land-use in the same three watersheds. Beaver Reservoir is located in northwest Arkansas along the White River and was created in 1965 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The surrounding territory is a mixture of wooded valleys and pasture land all underlain by the same geologic formations. Two sub-watersheds (Prairie Creek, Monte Ne Cove) are experiencing extensive land use change associated with explosive urbanization whereas the third watershed (Blackburn Creek) is within a wildlife management area of the Ozark National Forest and is relatively undisturbed. Morphometric properties examined included watershed area, total relief, slope and slope distribution, slope aspect, stream density, and stream profiles. The morphometries of each sub-watershed were derived from newly processed 7.62-m LIDAR elevation data as well as from publicly-available 30-m and 10-m digital elevation data. Initial results of the study indicate that some morphometric parameters are more influenced by the spatial resolution of terrain data, suggesting differences in the robustness of morphometric parameters. Varying parameter inputs to watershed models can also have a large impact on model outputs, so understanding the impact of spatial resolution on parameters is of great importance in determining the meaning and value of model outputs. In this instance, varying derived slopes, stream densities, and resultant stream profiles would significantly impact modeled erosion and sediment flux within the three sub-watersheds.
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 143--Booth# 39|
Sigma Gamma Epsilon Student Research (Posters)
Pennsylvania Convention Center: Exhibit Hall C
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 24 October 2006
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 353
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.