|2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)|
|Paper No. 235-12|
|Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM|
DEVELOPING A NEW GEOLOGY PROGRAM AT A SMALL, STATE-SUPPORTED UNIVERSITY
BAUER, Jeffrey A., Department of Natural Sciences, Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, OH 45662, email@example.com|
Shawnee State University (SSU) was given approval to offer baccalaureate degrees in 1986 becoming Ohio's 13th and youngest state university. Over the last 20 years, SSU has grown to over 3800 students and has added a variety of new academic programs. During this time, the Department of Natural Sciences, which started with a single, generalized science degree, has added majors in chemistry and biology. In fall 2005, SSU initiated a geology program.
SSU's geology program is the result of seven years of planning and development which can be traced through four stages – Planning, Assessment, Proposal, and Implementation. During the Planning Stage, basic questions were addressed like: How will a geology program blend with current academic offerings? What students will geology serve? What additional resources will be necessary for the program?
In the Assessment Stage, student interest was measured through a Likert-scale survey administered in introductory geology courses. Administrative and faculty support were gauged through informal surveys. The latter served a dual purpose of notifying the campus that a proposal was forthcoming.
In the Proposal Stage, it was decided that geology would be offered through a concentration within an already existing degree – the Bachelor of Science in Natural Science - rather than as a stand-alone major. By following this path, financial risk was reduced and likelihood for approval was increased. The geology proposal was tentatively approved by SSU in 2002. The university provided necessary funding for the program in 2005.
SSU's geology program, currently in the Implementation Stage, completed its first year during which eight students declared concentrations in either geology or earth science education. The program's flexibility, low cost, and modest growth potential should help to secure its survival and future success.
2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 235--Booth# 139|
Building New and Rebuilding Defunct College and University Geoscience Programs for the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities, Successes and Failures (Posters)
Pennsylvania Convention Center: Exhibit Hall C
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, 25 October 2006
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 38, No. 7, p. 567
© Copyright 2006 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.