CAN YOU USE GEOPHYSICAL TOOLS TO INVESTIGATE KARST? MAYBE
Geophysical tools have been used in many instances to attempt to characterize the subsurface in karst areas. Even when reported by engineering geophysicists, the results have not always lived up to expectations. Many successful geophysical investigations have no hard data to backup the results. Geophysical tools used in karst include micro-gravity, seismic reflection/refraction, cross-hole tomography, ground penetrating radar, Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) and electrical resistivity/conductivity.
The authors will present some examples of data and the proffered interpretations. In general, we believe that some techniques are applicable in the younger, flat-lying carbonates (e.g., Florida coral), while others may be more appropriate in the mid-continent, flat-lying carbonates. However, virtually any geophysical technique used to characterize the fractured and folded (bent) carbonates of the Appalachians are fraught with problems. The reasons for potential success and failure will be discussed in relation to the geologic regime with emphasis on the problems presented by bent karst interpretations.
In no instance do we believe that any geophysical techniques can be used as a stand-alone tool. They must be used in conjunction with direct, invasive test data from borings, probes and test pits. Use only with care and trepidation.