RECONSTRUCTING SEA-LEVEL CHANGE FROM SALT-MARSH FORAMINIFERA: STATISTICS AND ‘COMMON SENSE'
This paper reviews some of the advantages and disadvantages of the transfer-function approach, with particular attention to ecological and statistical reasons why a transfer function may not work properly. These include: (1) The modern distribution of microfauna is not adequately documented. Inaccurate transfer function results can be produced due to large seasonal variability of foraminiferal occurrences or if assemblages are included in the modern data set that are known to exist well beyond the sampled range. Low species diversity exacerbates this problem. (2) A fossil assemblage is not represented in the modern training set (the modern analogue problem'). This will often require a larger (regional) dataset that includes the missing taxa, or it involves disregarding some fossil taxa. In either case, the r2 value is not a realistic performance measure of the transfer function as considerable uncertainties about the true' sea-level relationship of the foraminifera may be introduced. (3) Available software limits the user to either unimodal or linear regression models for the entire foraminiferal dataset. Some salt-marsh foraminifera are linearly distributed along the height gradient (e.g. Jadammina macrescens), others unimodally (e.g. Tiphotrocha comprimata). By using a single model some species distributions will be inadequately described. There are not always clear-cut solutions to these problems, but by selecting a sensible sampling strategy for both the modern and the fossil environments the effectiveness of transfer functions can be maximized.