2006 Philadelphia Annual Meeting (22–25 October 2006)

Paper No. 9
Presentation Time: 3:45 PM

SULFUR ISOTOPE EVIDENCE FOR RAPID CEMENTATION OF THE NEOPROTEROZOIC ZHAMOKETI CAP CARBONATE IN THE QURUQTAGH AREA OF TIANSHAN


SHEN, Bing1, XIAO, Shuhai2, KAUFMAN, Alan Jay3, YUAN, Xunlai4 and ZHOU, Chuanming4, (1)Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061, (2)Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 4044 Derring Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, (3)Department of Geology, Univ of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, (4)Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China, bingshen@vt.edu

Cap carbonates ubiquitously overlie Marinoan-age diamictites and they show distinct sedimentary and geochemical features. In the Quruqtagh area of eastern Chinese Tianshan, three Neoproterozoic glaciations have been recognized; these are represented by, in ascending order, the Bayisi, Tereeken, and Hankalchough diamictites. The Tereeken diamictite shows unambiguous glaciation features, and is capped by a ~10 m thick carbonate of the Zhamoketi Formation. Sedimentary structures, carbon isotope signatures, as well as available geochronometric constraints are suggestive of a Marinoan age for the Tereeken glaciation. In this study, we analyzed sulfur isotopes of carbonate associated sulfate (CAS) and disseminated pyrite extracted from the Zhamoketi cap dolostone. d34Ssulfate values range from 10‰ to 20‰ (VCDT). d34Ssulfate values are similar, ranging from 11‰ to 18‰. D34S (d34Ssulfate – d34Spyrite) values are less than 8‰, and mostly less than 5‰. Various tests exclude the possibility that d34Ssulfate values are contaminated by pyrite oxidation during laboratory preparation or weathering, nor could sulfate be the product of post-depositional oxidation of pyrite, because sulfate is much more abundance than pyrite. Thus, the small difference between sulfate and pyrite appears a real signal. However, this small difference does not appear to be related to ocean-wide sulfate limitation, because the Zhamoketi cap dolostone contains 80-800 ppm sulfate. CAS concentration shows a decreasing stratigraphic trend, suggesting that sulfate was removed from the ocean during the deposition of the Zhamoketi cap carbonate. We suggest that the fast sedimentation rate of the cap carbonate and fast removal of sulfate from the Quruqtagh ocean may have partially contributed to the little difference between d34Ssulfate and d34Spyrite values of the Zhamoketi cap carbonate. In addition, the rapid rain of fine-grained carbonate and the virtually instantaneous cementation of the cap carbonate shut off all connections between pore water and sea water in the glacial aftermath. Thus, CAS was mostly derived from sea water sulfate, but pyrite from pore water sulfate through quantitative sulfate reduction.