GARNET COMPOSITIONS PRODUCING PROTECTIVE-SURFACE COATINGS IDENTIFIED USING THE PILLING-BEDWORTH RULE
The chemical compositions of four almandine garnet samples from western North Carolina and one almandine garnet sample from southern Lancaster County, Pennsylvania where obtained. Microscopic observations reveal that the garnets from western North Carolina form protective-surface coatings while the southern Lancaster County, Pennsylvania garnet does not. The values obtained by applying the Pilling-Bedworth rule to all five garnets shows that none of them should have produced a protective-surface coating of goethite and gibbsite for their respective chemical compositions, while only one of the western North Carolina garnets would not produce a protective-surface coating of goethite and kaolinite. Therefore, the likely weathering products for the Lancaster County, Pennsylvania garnets are goethite and gibbsite, while for the North Carolina garnets, goethite and kaolinite are the likely secondary minerals.
These results underscore the importance of proper secondary mineral characterization when applying the Pilling-Bedworth Rule to almandine garnet weathering. Substituting kaolinite for gibbsite demonstrates how changing a secondary mineral can impact the number of garnets producing a protective-surface coating. Microscopic confirmation of the presence of a protective-surface coating, along with XRD and other microanalytical methods is necessary to support that the proper secondary minerals have been identified.