USING GEOLOGICAL CONCEPT SURVEYS TO GAUGE THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF COURSE COMPONENTS AND INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS IN GEOSCIENCE CLASSES
Survey questions were chosen to cover three content subsets, topics only covered in lecture, topics only covered in lab and topics that were covered in both lecture and lab. In addition, whenever possible, survey questions were designed to integrate known misconceptions and alternate conceptions students have about how the Earth works. Results from the study were striking. As expected, labs proved to be far more effective than lecture, but the degree to which traditional lectures failed to alter students' concepts was dismaying. On most lecture-only topics, significant changes in student knowledge only occurred when lecture activities were designed to specifically address and challenge students' prior understanding of the topic. For the most part these 'interventions' were capable of raising the lecture component's effectiveness to rival the lab component's, but few instructors are aware of the necessity for these interventions.
In order to design an effective lecture 'intervention', instructors also need to know their students prior understanding of the topic or the background students will use to approach the topic. Without this information, classroom instruction, curriculum development and concept inventory construction will not be effective. Unfortunately, even the briefest investigation reveals how little we really know of our students' perceptions of the Earth.