102nd Annual Meeting of the Cordilleran Section, GSA, 81st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Section, AAPG, and the Western Regional Meeting of the Alaska Section, SPE (8–10 May 2006)

Paper No. 13
Presentation Time: 1:00 PM-4:00 PM

MEGASCOPIC AND PETROGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE MONARCH CANYON METAMORPHIC CORE COMPLEX AND THIER IMPLICATIONS ON TIMING OF PEAK METAMORPHIC CONTITIONS


MURETTA, Megan Y., SCHWEICKERT, Richard A. and MACCORMACK, John, Department of Geological Sciences, Mackay School of Earth Science and Engineering, Geological Sciences/172, Reno, NV 89557, murettam@unr.nevada.edu

Traditional interpretations of the age constraints on peak metamorphism within the Monarch Canyon metamorphic core complex suggest a possible mid- to-Late Cretaceous age.  However, certain megascopic relationships within the core suggest a much older age.  Preliminary structural and petrographic studies in Monarch Canyon suggest a relative timing of structural fabric development.  We suggest that four main deformational events are represented by fabrics in Monarch Canyon, as follows: D1 –D2 represented by S1-S2 foliation, isoclinal F2 folds, and L2 mineral lineations, defined by aligned kyanite crystals, D3 represented by west vergent F3 folds that deform the S1-S2 foliation and L2 mineral lineations and a crenulation cleavage in the hinges of these west vergent folds; boudinaged pegmatite dikes and sills display D4 extensional deformation. The west-vergent F3 folds predate the ductile extension related to boudinage of the pegmatites. If these interpretations are correct, the peak metamorphic events can not be Late Cretaceous in age as suggested by previous authors from age constraints on the boudinaged pegmatites. We also observed that there are discrepancies with the specific locations of shear zones mentioned by previous authors and that some of the proposed ductile shear zones are brittle fault zones.