GEOLOGICAL CO2 SEQUESTRATION IN OHIO—A LOOK AT NEAR-TERM PROJECTS
However, subsurface geologic mapping has also shown this sequestration capacity is not evenly distributed across the state. In fact, large areas have little or no known subsurface capacity for storage, while others have multiple CO2 sequestration options available at a single location. Therefore, locating future CO2 point sources where the subsurface geology is favorable for large-scale CO2 injection is critical if this technology is to be used. Furthermore, the economics of transporting CO2 from these existing sources to a CO2 storage site must now be analyzed.
Recently, several large projects were proposed within Ohio for plants capable of capturing nearly pure streams of CO2. These include an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant, synthetic liquid-fuels plants, and ethanol plants. Ohio is also vying for the proposed U.S. DOE-sponsored, FutureGen clean-coal power plant, which, as part of its design, would sequester at least 90% of its produced CO2. These new facilities may become the first to entirely embrace geologic CO2 sequestration and begin the process of building the infrastructure required to compress, transport, and inject CO2 in the subsurface in Ohio.