USING THE GCI TO EVALUATE STUDENT LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY GEOSCIENCE COURSES THAT USE CONCEPTESTS TO PROMOTE PEER LEARNING
The results from the Fall and Spring 2005 semesters are mixed. Libarkin and Anderson (2005) report a mean of 42.2 percent for the GCI pre-test given to approximately 1500 students in diverse settings with different class sizes and lecture styles across the country and a post-test mean of 45.8 percent (approximately 1300 students). We recorded a pre-test mean of 41.1 percent and a post-test mean of 46.1 percent for the Fall 2005 Introduction to Geology class (41 students). These results are very similar to Libarkin and Anderson (2005). In contrast the Spring 2005 Environmental Geology class (36 students) recorded a pre-test mean of 35.1 percent and a post-test mean of 47.5 percent. This would appear to represent a significant increase in conceptual understanding. The average pre-GALT score for the Fall 2005 class was 7.3 and was 6.64 for the Spring 2005 class. The other difference between the two classes revealed by the GALT exam is that the Fall 2005 class had a higher proportion of formal thinkers (39.0 percent) compared to the Spring 2005 class (22.2 percent). Also there was a slightly higher percentage (16.7 compared to 14.7) of the Spring 2005 class had no exposure to Earth Science in high school. In conclusion, although the results are mixed they may indicate that conceptests may more impact on classes that are less prepared and have more students that have never been formally exposed to Earth Science than for classes that are academically more prepared.