COMPLEX CONCRETIONS IN THE JURASSIC MORRISON FORMATION
On a microscopic scale the contact between concretions and country rock is dominantly irregular and gradational. Thin section point count comparisons of eight concretions with eight samples of country rock show significantly more cement (P < 0.001) and fewer primary pores (P < 0.001) in the concretions; also significantly fewer grains and more IGV (P = 0.014 for both) in the concretions. SEM of the concretions shows dominant pore-filling microcrystalline quartz, including intergrowth with illite/smectite. The country rock shows variable amounts of pore linings and local pore fillings composed of chlorite, kaolinite, illite/smectite, hematite, and microcrystalline quartz. Comparisons by XRF shows significantly more Si (P < 0.001) and less Al, Fe, Na, K, Mn, and Mg (P °Ü 0.003) in the concretions. NA shows significantly less Na, Fe, Rb, Sb, and La (P °Ü 0.007) in the concretions; Si and Al were not tested by NA. These data suggest that silica is added to the country rock to form the concretions.
Petrographic analysis seems to invalidate the suggestion of a fulgurite origin. Thus far, we have not found a convincing termite nest architecture or termites, and this brings into question the fossil termite nest interpretation. The rhizoconcretion interpretation also appears to be problematic due to general morphological factors and a paucity of ramifications. It may be that the concretionary process follows in part the pattern of the abundant "tubes," of organic or inorganic origin, that are already present in the country rock. It is hoped that the data presented above will help elucidate the origin of these intriguing structures.