|2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)|
|Paper No. 26-30|
|Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM|
TOOTH ENAMEL MICROSTRUCTURE OF SELECTED ARCHOSAURS REPTILIA: ARCHOSAURIA FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC CHINLE GROUP, WESTERN USA: TAXONOMIC AND EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE
HECKERT, Andrew B. and CAMP, Jessica, Dept. of Geology, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32067, Boone, NC 28608, email@example.com|
Within Amniota, tooth enamel microstructure yields much information on taxonomy, functional morphology, ontogeny, and phylogeny. We surveyed tooth enamel microstructural features in five archosaurs from the Upper Triassic Chinle Group: three heterodont phytosaurs, the crurotarsan Revueltosaurus callenderi, and the putative ornithischian Krzyzanowskisaurus hunti. The phytosaurs most likely represent the genera Angistorhinus, Rutiodon (=Smilosuchus), and Redondasaurus, taxa known from strata of Otischalkian (early-late Carnian), Adamanian (late-latest Carnian) and Apachean (latest Norian-Rhaetian) age, respectively. K. hunti is restricted to strata of Adamanian age and R. callenderi to strata of Revueltian (early-mid Norian) age. The sample size is small (14 teeth total), yet more comprehensive than in most similar studies. All taxa exhibit some form of columnar enamel, the derived condition in archosaurs. Columnar enamel is best expressed in Angistorhinus and Rutiodon, and less so in Redondasaurus, and columnar features are much better developed in the phytosaurs than in either R. callenderi or K. hunti, although the latter tend to have much thicker enamel (up to 130 µm), especially relative to their overall size. Lines of incremental growth (LIGs) are present to varying degrees in Angistorhinus, Redondasaurus, R. callenderi, and K. hunti. LIGs were not well developed in the phytosaurs but much more pronounced in the other taxa. There is no convincing taxonomic variation in enamel microstrucuture features in phytosaurs as intraspecific (positional and/or ontogenetic) variation is extensive. Phytosaur enamel is broadly similar to other xiphydont archosaurian carnivores in it its thickness (~15-115 µm; average 40-60 µm) and columnar structure. Similarities supporting a close relationship between R. callenderi and K. hunti include overall thickness and thickness trends, the poorly defined columnar units, and the expression of LIGs, although these similarities may also indicate that the two taxa convergently evolved a similar feeding strategy. Thick enamel and columnar (rather than parallel) enamel are associated with relatively durophagous diets, but not grinding mastication. The numerous LIGs imply a longer period of growth and slower replacement in these genera than in phytosaurs.
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 26--Booth# 104|
Paleontology (Posters) I: Faunas, Forms, and Phylogenies
Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall E/F
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, 28 October 2007
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 77
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.