|2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)|
|Paper No. 144-39|
|Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM|
CLUMPING BEHAVIOR: AN ANTI-PREDATORY STRATEGY AGAINST DRILLING PREDATION
CASEY, Michelle, Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06511, email@example.com and CHATTOPADHYAY, Devapriya, Department of Earth Sciences, IISER Kolkata, Mohanpur, 741252, India|
Predatory drill holes in marine invertebrates serve as one of the rare sources of data for the study of ancient predator-prey interactions since in most other cases the predator does not leave easily interpretable traces of its behavior. For this reason, drill hole data have been very important in the study of predation especially for testing its role in evolution. One commonly used metric of predation intensity has been the frequency of drill holes, while position of drill holes has been used to study the behavior of predators. Because drilling frequency and site stereotypy can be influenced by different defensive strategies, the study of such strategies is an important part of research on predation. In this study, we explore the effect of clumping on drill hole frequency and position.
A previous study showed that Mytilus trossulus used clumping behavior as an anti-predatory mechanism against durophagous predation (Cote & Jelnikar, 1999). In this study, we used laboratory experiments to explore the effect of clumping on drilling predation using the same mussel, Mytilus trossulus, as prey and the drilling gastropod, Nucella lamellosa, as predator. We assigned mussels to two groups: in one, mussels were allowed to clump together with their byssal threads; in the other, they were kept separate. We observed a significant difference in drilling frequency between the two groups, confirming that clumping acts as a successful anti-predatory strategy against drilling predators. However, in spite of potential differences in prey handling and grappling due to clumping, mean hole placement and variation in hole placement (as measured by standard deviation) showed no significant differences between the two groups. These observations suggest that comparison of predation intensities across clumping and non-clumping taxa, must consider the anti-predatory effect of this behavior.
2007 GSA Denver Annual Meeting (28–31 October 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 144--Booth# 122|
Paleontology (Posters) II: Environments, Ecosystems, and Interactions
Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall E/F
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, 30 October 2007
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 403
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.