MINERAL REPLACEMENT CLARIFIES GEOCHEMICAL DYNAMICS: EXAMPLES FROM WEATHERING AND PETROLOGY
Brucite-for-periclase replacement in magnesian marbles is represented by MgO(pericl) + H2O = Mg(OH)2(bruc), which assumes Mg is immobile and ignores that replacement preserves volume. The correct statement is 2.2MgO(pericl) + 2.4H+ = Mg(OH)2(bruc) + 1.2Mg++ + 0.2H2O, which preserves mineral volume and tells us what drives the dolomite-for-calcite replacement corona that occurs around the brucite: the released Mg++ does. Only now do we see that the two replacements were simultaneous and coupled, one driving the other.
Students of weathering calculate mass loss and gain in the weathering profile by assuming that Al, Ti, etc., is immobile. But when, for example, gibbsite replaces K-feldspar in lateritization, it is the volume, not Al, that gets conserved. This requires approx. 3 gibbsite formulas in the replacement reaction: KAlSi3O8(fp) + 2Al3+(aq) + 7H2O = 3Al(OH)3(gibb) + K+ + 3SiO2 + 5H+. We now see that Al3+(aq) must be supplied from above to the feldspar being replaced, and that it is not immobile. This leads us to find the feedback central to the weathering of aluminosilicates at a moving reaction front, a feedback which remains hidden if Al is assumed immobile.