PLACEMENT OF COAL COMBUSTION BY-PRODUCTS AT COAL MINES: AN OVERVIEW OF REGULATORY AND TECHNICAL ISSUES
Extensive regulatory authority water quality monitoring data and university research data indicates that the placement of these materials under the permitting and performance standard requirements at a mine regulated under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) usually results in a beneficial impact to human health and the environment when it is used to mitigate other existing potential mining hazards. In the 30 years of SMCRA, there have been no proven Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) damage cases on SMCRA mines and all of the State Regulatory Authority quarterly water monitoring data has not resulted in a single instance of damage to a drinking water supply or damage to a surface aquatic ecosystem.
The volume of CCB placement at SMCRA mines is generally controlled by economics. Current or foreseeable economics of CCB placement at mines is restricted to: (1) situations of low transportation costs (i.e. mine mouth power plants); (2) very small power plants that can not afford to develop their own Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) solid waste landfill due to the low volume of material and then only if a coal mine is close enough so that transportation is affordable; (3) a unique beneficial application at the mine justifies additional transportation cost such as use of CCBs for road building or other construction material, encapsulation of acid forming materials, and subsidence control and mitigation of acid mine drainage.