USING DEBRIS RETENTION BASIN DATA TO UPDATE MODELS THAT PREDICT SEDIMENT VOLUME FROM DEBRIS FLOWS AND FLOODS
Sediment removed from debris basins may include material deposited by many storms. In addition, many of the storms during periods between sediment removals may not have been large enough to produce any significant sediment from runoff. In order to identify these storms, we examined the rainfall records from periods where no debris was deposited to define the threshold rainfall intensity-duration conditions below which we would not expect sediment delivery to a basin. A weighted average of the remaining threshold-exceeding storms was used to divide the volumes of sediment removed from debris basins into single event data. Multiple regression was used to generate models that predict debris flow volume as a function of storm rainfall, fire history, soil properties and drainage network.
A test of the models, using addtional rainfall and volume of debris flow data from 2003 in San Bernardino, indicated that the models generally under-predict the volume of sediment runoff. This may be due to the lack of large sediment volumes in the data used to generate the models. Sediment volumes were divided among many different storms, when only one or two storms may have produced the majority of the sediment. As new information on the relationship between individual storms and deposited sediment volumes, and the extent and severity of wildfire preceding a depositional event becomes available, better models can be developed.