THE UPPER PALEOZOIC GENUS LOPHOPHYLLIDIUM IN MID-CONTINENT U.S.A
Coral skeletal carbonate is not at all uniform, being formed incrementally, with first-formed and later parts having different structure and composition. Skeletal structure now is seen to have primary importance in the interpretation of systematic position, skeletogenesis and diagenetic history. Additonally, geochemical sampling is dependent on understanding coral skeletal microstructure, as minor and trace elements vary from early to later-formed skeleton. Cements (the white portion) provide clues to diagenetic history and minor element chemistry of the skeleton. Study of encapsulated corals from shales and asphalt beds provides significant insight into the geochemistry of involved genera and species, but within capsule cements must be evaluated along with skeletal carbonate.
Lophophyllidium belongs to the Cyathaxonia fauna characteristic of the Carboniferous and Permian. These lack dissepiments and in general inhabited argillaceous and/or deeper water environments. It is probable that these were non-zooxanthellate corals, approximate equivalents to modern non-reef-forming (ahermatypic) corals. Excellent preservation of Lophophyllidium in Pennsylvanian shales and asphalt have led to geochemical study of them, and resulted in the erroneous conclusion that their observed chemistry is typical for Paleozoic corals. In actuality, there are major differences between the Lophophyllidium faunas of Upper Paleozoic shales and other Paleozoic Rugosa, in life habit, habitat and resulting skeletal chemistry. Not all is black and white.