USE OF THE ‘HOLLOW EARTH THEORY' TO TEACH STUDENTS HOW TO CRITICALLY EVALUATE THEORIES
After an in-class activity and mini-lecture on the scientific method, I present the students with Raymond Bernard's version of The Hollow Earth Theory' (The Hollow Earth, 1969, University Press, 254 pages). I provide them with a diagram, and I summarize the model (a hollow earth with an internal sun', openings at the poles, inhabited by advanced life'). I also summarize the evidence' for the hollow earth, which includes: Admiral Byrd's Antarctic exploration reports, the fact' that UFOs and flying saucers have north-south flight paths because they are travelling from one entrance to another, and that aurora borealis and aurora australis are a consequence of the light from the internal sun' escaping from the polar entrances to hollow earth.
Students are typically amused and incredulous that I am telling them about something they know' not to be true. The advantages of using such an absurd example are multifold: 1. It is unlikely to challenge their religious or other personal beliefs, and thus frees them to enter into vigorous debate; 2. It forces the students to grapple with how they know what they know, the distinction between facts and interpretations, and in the importance of formulating and testing hypotheses. 3. It allows them to better distinguish between beliefs and scientific theories. 4. Student understanding of theories is much improved when they have actively engaged in discussion; students appear to be more receptive to discussion of evolutionary theory when their understanding of the place and development of scientific theories is already established. I conclude the module with a simple exercise / worksheet that makes it absolutely clear that the Hollow Earth Theory is NOT a scientific theory, and has no basis in fact.