|Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)|
|Paper No. 2-8|
|Presentation Time: 10:40 AM-11:00 AM|
MODELING HYDROLOGY AND FISH OCCURRENCE IN ISOLATED WETLANDS TO IDENTIFY WETLAND COMPLEXES FOR MANAGEMENT
SNODGRASS, Joel, Biological Sciences, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, firstname.lastname@example.org and BRYAN, A. Lawrence Jr, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Drawer E, Aiken, TN 29802|
It is widely recognized that depression wetlands are important habitats for a range of flora and fauna, and that their conservation will be essential in protecting biological diversity in the southeast. However, a wetland-by-wetland approach to conserving and managing depression wetlands is not likely to be an effective strategy because hydroperiods and biological communities vary greatly among wetlands and among years within wetlands. Because wetland associated species are often adapted to specific hydroperiods and sets of biological interactions, and may require adjacent uplands to complete their life cycles, a collection or landscape of wetlands encompassing natural variation in hydroperiod and biotic conditions will be required. Operationally, land managers currently have little guidance in identifying and prioritizing isolated wetland landscapes for conservation purposes. We used information on the occurrence of surface water and fishes in 91 wetlands on the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina to generate classification tree models of hydroperiod and fish occurrence based on wetland habitat conditions and landscape position. We then hierarchically clustered wetlands based on their geographic location and assessed diversity in predicted hydroperiod and fish presence/absence within clusters to identify the spatial extent of wetland landscapes that would provide protection of the range of hydroperiod and fish presence/absence conditions found in these systems. The size of wetland landscapes identified as encompassing diversity of hydrological and predatory conditions among wetlands often closely corresponded to the area of small stream watersheds, but not all small watersheds contained the complete range of variation. Our approach should provide land planners with guidance in selecting management units for isolated wetlands.
Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 2|
Geology and Ecology of Carolina Bays
Hyatt Regency Savannah on the Historic Riverfront: Ballroom E
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, 29 March 2007
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 6
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.