|Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)|
|Paper No. 2-2|
|Presentation Time: 8:20 AM-8:40 AM|
SEDIMENTOLOGY AND AGES OF CAROLINA BAY SAND RIMS
IVESTER, Andrew Harold, Geosciences, University of West Georgia, 1601 Maple Street, Carrollton, GA 30118-3100, firstname.lastname@example.org, BROOKS, Mark J., Savannah River Archaeological Research Program, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, P.O. Box 400, New Ellenton, SC 29809, and TAYLOR, Barbara E., Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, P.O. Drawer E, Aiken, SC 29802|
The eastern and southeastern margins of Carolina bays are commonly bordered by single or multiple, laterally separated shorelines and sand rims, documenting fluctuating lake levels and episodic shoreline stability. These sand rims consist of a combination of eolian and underlying or laterally adjacent shore face sediments. Water-lain pebbles intercalated with eolian sands indicate that these are typical shoreline deposits resulting from fluctuations in water level. Some rims are too subtle to distinguish visually in the field, but can be seen on aerial photography by differences in soil, vegetation, and topography. Optically stimulated luminescence ages of bay rims sampled in Georgia and South Carolina reveal clustering of dates for rim formation and activity during and just prior to stadials over the past 130 ka. At individual bays where concentric rims occur, dating has established that rims are progressively younger toward the center of the bay, reflecting a regressive sequence and confirming that the bays are not single-event features but evolve as a result of processes active episodically over a long period of time. Active shorelines and associated eolian deposition occurred during marine isotope stage (MIS) 2 to late MIS 3 (~12 to 50 ka), MIS 4 to very late MIS 5 (60-80 ka), and late MIS 6 (120 to 140 ka) based on a cumulative total of 45 OSL dates. These age ranges also correspond with the ages of other eolian landforms in the Coastal Plain, including sand sheets and dunefields, and suggest a climatic threshold was crossed during the transition toward glacial stadials, initiating both bay and dune activity. In addition to these age ranges, some OSL dates indicate that bays also were active during the Holocene and Sangamon Interglacials. Sedimentology and archaeology of the upper few meters of bay rims suggest surface reworking by localized colluviation, eolian remobilization, and pedoturbation during the Holocene. Some of the ages represent this type of surface reworking. However, some of the interglacial ages, especially those of the early Holocene, are from sediments that suggest primary littoral or eolian deposition. Therefore certain combinations of bay water level and climatic conditions also allowed bay rim formation during interglacials.
Southeastern Section–56th Annual Meeting (29–30 March 2007)
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 2|
Geology and Ecology of Carolina Bays
Hyatt Regency Savannah on the Historic Riverfront: Ballroom E
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, 29 March 2007
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 5
© Copyright 2007 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.