THE CHINCOTEAGUE PALEOVALLEY AND CHINCOTEAGUE BIGHT
Several explanations involving differential rates of erosion linked to wave-energy distribution have been offered for the creation of Chincoteague Bight. We believe that other factors may have had a strong influence on the development of this part of the Virginia coast. Seismic and geomorphic data suggest the offset might be explained by the strong influence of antecedent drainage patterns on transgressive processes. Watersheds along the northern margin of the Chesapeake Bay have spatial characteristics that were used to reconstruct transgressed systems on the continental shelf. Paleochannels beneath the inner shelf were used to orient the transgressed watersheds, and to locate and define paleo-drainage characteristics.
The Chincoteague Bight is believed to be partially controlled by the oblique intersection of the Chincoteague Paleovalley and the Atlantic coastline. The axis of Chincoteague Bay is on a bearing of (23º- 203º) and has an average flooded valley width of about 9.25 km. The coastline has a bearing of about 213º. Projecting the coastline across Chincoteague Bay produces a "stretched" valley-section that is about 4.5 times the width of a perpendicular section. Since the width of Chincoteague Bight is comparable to the width of the stretched valley section, we believe that the Bight is at least partially influenced by the unique intersection of the coastline and the paleovalley. South of Chincoteague Bight, seismic tributary patterns flow northeast providing additional validation for valley location.