|2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM|
|Paper No. 53-5|
|Presentation Time: 9:40 AM-10:00 AM|
Subsidence, Wetland Loss, and Hydrocarbon Production In the Mississippi Delta Plain
MORTON, Robert A., U.S. Geological Survey, 10100 Burnet Rd., Bldg 130, Austin, TX 78758, email@example.com, BERNIER, Julie C., U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, 600 4th St. South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, and BARRAS, John A., U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70894|
Subsidence and wetland loss in coastal Louisiana continue to create concerns for government officials because their inferred causes influence plans for coastal restoration and hazard mitigation. Recent studies by the USGS show that in the Mississippi delta plain, subsidence and wetland loss correlate both temporally and spatially with long-term, large-volume production of oil, gas, and associated formation water. All three parameters generally followed the same historical trends with low rates before the 1960s, accelerated rates during the 1960s and 1970s, and decreasing rates since the 1970s. Subsidence-rate and wetland-loss declines generally have lagged behind the declined rates of fluid extraction. Large decreases in reservoir pore pressures associated with fluid withdrawal likely caused reservoir compaction, altered subsurface stresses, and reactivated some faults that were near the threshold of failure.
Many processes other than subsidence (e.g., direct removal, storms) can also convert wetlands to open water, but subsidence accounts for much of the extensive interior wetland losses in the Mississippi delta plain that occurred during the 1960s and 1970s. During this period, subsidence rates were an order of magnitude greater than rates averaged over geological time scales (millennia). Natural internal basin processes such as deep-seated salt mobilization and fault movement cannot be ruled out entirely, but there is no compelling evidence that these processes were responsible for the observed changes. In fact, repeat leveling surveys show historical subsidence over salt domes rather than uplift, as expected. Furthermore, it would be difficult to explain the recent reductions in subsidence rates if rapid subsidence were related to tectonic processes.
Former delta-plain marshes are now submerged beneath water that averages 0.5 to 1.0 m deep. Although magnitudes of subsidence are not large relative to other examples of production-induced subsidence, minor reductions in elevation result in extensive permanent submergence when coastal wetlands are near sea level.
2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM
General Information for this Meeting
|Session No. 53|
Land Subsidence Attributable to Subsurface Fluid Extraction in Coastal Lowlands: Contributions to Relative Sea-Level Rise
George R. Brown Convention Center: 352DEF
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 6 October 2008
© Copyright 2008 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.