The Utility of Knowledge Surveys in a Culture of Overwork: Design of Introductory Courses That Meet Institutional Educational and Assessment Requirements
Specialists are not sole arbiters in deciding "What should students learn in our classrooms?" A broader constituency of scholars decides an institution's general or liberal education goal requirements. Pertinent to geology is the fact that in some form these convey a science literacy goal for graduates to achieve deep learning about how we understand and explain the physical world through testable knowledge. That decision accounts for the vast majority of students in our geology courses, so it confers special responsibility on instructors to deliver learning that achieves published institutional outcomes. Today, accreditation agencies scrutinize to see whether published learning outcomes are met, and it is in schools' interests to ensure that they are. Geoscience may be in the best position of any discipline to confer science literacy. It offers authentic experiences and case illustrations in both the classic "scientific method" of replicable experiments and the method of multiple working hypotheses, which geologists first developed and articulated. Knowledge surveys can help us more effectively design, produce, and assess the deep learning we want and that required from our institutions.