2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM

Paper No. 2
Presentation Time: 8:20 AM

Additional Information Provided from the Analyses of Stable Chlorine and Bromine Isotopes in Formation Fluids from Sedimentary Basins


FRAPE, Shaun1, SHOUAKAR-STASH, Orfan2, STOTLER, Randy3, KENNELL, Laura2 and ROSTRON, Benjamin J.4, (1)Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada, (2)Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada, (3)Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, (4)Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, shaun@uwaterloo.ca

Literature concerning sedimentary basinal fluids usually compares the dominant halide ions chloride and bromide. Their evolution during seawater evaporation and mineral formation has been well documented. Recently, isotopic researchers have worked to expand the usefulness of chlorine and bromine stable isotope analyses towards understanding basinal processes.

Formation waters from a number of sedimentary settings show δ37Cl and δ81Br values are characterized by variations in the order of -1.3‰ to +1.82‰ for chlorine (SMOC) and -1.50‰ to +3.35‰ for bromine (SMOB). Interestingly, a positive trend was found, where enrichment of δ81Br is coupled to δ37Cl enrichment.

The ability to use these two isotopic tools parallel to traditional chemistry, elemental ratio trends (e.g. Br/Cl) and isotopic parameters such as 18O, 2H and 87Sr has revealed a number of hitherto unknown trends in several well studied basins. In the Paleozoic sequences in southern Ontario and Michigan, the δ37Cl and δ81Br signatures of formation water collected from northwest of the Algonquin Arch are distinct, with depleted isotopic values in comparison with those collected from southeast of the Arch. The δ81Br signatures of the two brines show total separation with no overlaps.

The δ81Br and δ37Cl signatures of Williston Basin brines suggest several different isotopically distinct brines exist in different stratigraphic units, despite chemical similarities. The relatively wide range of δ37Cl and δ81Br of the formation waters suggests that the ocean isotopic signatures were variable over geologic time. A seawater temporal curve for δ81Br and δ37Cl was proposed with a larger variation of δ81Br in comparison with &delta37Cl, which agrees very well with 87Sr/86Sr seawater variation during the same period.

In general, the use of chlorine and bromine stable isotopes can be very useful in assessing the origin and evolutionary processes involved in evolving formation waters and also in distinguishing different brines (end members).