2008 Joint Meeting of The Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies with the Gulf Coast Section of SEPM

Paper No. 5
Presentation Time: 9:00 AM

Spatial Prediction of Paleoenvironments Using GIS


BARBOUR WOOD, Susan L.1, DAVIS, Ronald W.1, KERFONTA, Matthew1 and DALEY, Gwen M.2, (1)Geosciences and Natural Resources, Western Carolina University, 331 Stillwell Building, Cullowhee, NC 28723, (2)Department of Chemistry, Physics, and Geology, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC 29732, susanwood@email.wcu.edu

In modern ecologic studies, the delineation of faunal gradients, ecological relationships, species diversity, and virtually any other characteristic of fauna and/or flora in a landscape requires an understanding of potential species interactions as well as habitat and environment conditions. The use of paleontological death assemblages to recreate ancient ecosystems is more difficult, posing a greater risk of error from such factors as taphonomic bias, temporal mixing, improper sampling and associated sampling issues and human error.

Geographic information systems (GIS) are widely applied in modeling modern species-habitat relationships, and we investigated the use of GIS in modeling ecosystem conditions for a hypothetical depositional paleoenvironment of the upper Miocene Eastover and Pliocene Yorktown formations. The model was based on parameters recovered during over a decade of bulk field sampling of the Atlantic Coastal Plain in Virginia. Truly random sampling of paleoenvironments is improbable due to outcrop limitations, so a sampling transect was created in the model based on an "ideal" continuous outcrop.

Kriging is a geostatistical interpolation technique that generates an estimated surface, substrate muddiness in our model, from a set of points with known values. A set of 60 points along the modeled outcrop were used to develop the reference surface. The substrate value (percent mud) for each sampling point was depicted along an environmental substrate gradient in the model based on actual sieve analyses of 44 samples of bulk field material, which ranged from 0.74% to 36% mud. Points were iteratively removed from the model to estimate the sensitivity of sampling rates to the recovery of the known (modeled) landscape. This analytical technique can, in turn, be combined with faunal or other data to create predictive paleoenvironmental maps via interpolation between sampling points. Models of the suitability of kriging at different scales will be discussed.