Mineralogical, Geochemical, and Geochronological Evidences of Evolution of the Eastern Himalayan Foreland Basins
Sandstone modal analysis documents that Eocene Disang (Qt56F5L40), Oligocene Barail (Qt59F7L34), Miocene Surma (Qt68F3L29), and Mio-Pliocene Tipam (Qt53F9L38) from Assam and Oligocene Barail (Qt83F3L14), Miocene Surma (Qt59F18L23), Mio-Pliocene Tipam (Qt57F14L29), and Pliocene Dupi Tila (Qt54F21L25) from the Bengal Basin plot in the “recycled orogenic” provenance field of Dickinson, suggesting an orogenic source from the Himalayas and/or Indo-Burman Ranges. Detrital heavy-mineral studies, including garnets also suggest orogenic source terranes with input from low-to-medium grade metamorphic rocks. Chrome spinels from the Bengal Basin were probably derived either from the Himalayan arc material or Indo-Burmese Alpine-type ophiolites, and that of Assam were mostly from the Indo-Burman Ranges. The Bengal Miocene muscovite cooling ages range from 11Ma to 66 Ma, with modes at 17 Ma and that of Assam ranges from 28 Ma to 81 Ma, with modes at 39 Ma and 77 Ma, suggesting older source rocks for Assam Miocene units; most likely the Gangedese batholith of Tibet and the Mogok belt of Myanmar. Whole-rock chemistry data reveal that all the samples analyzed from the Assam Basin and the post-Oligocene sediments from the Bengal Basin were derived from granodiorite and granitic source rocks. The Bengal Oligocene samples however show high-silica content suggesting intense chemical weathering during deposition close to the equator.